![scribd battletech tactical operations scribd battletech tactical operations](https://i2.wp.com/www.zone-six.net/wp-content/uploads/2019/04/battlemech.png)
![scribd battletech tactical operations scribd battletech tactical operations](https://images-na.ssl-images-amazon.com/images/I/41+QfRJTfcL.jpg)
- #SCRIBD BATTLETECH TACTICAL OPERATIONS MANUAL#
- #SCRIBD BATTLETECH TACTICAL OPERATIONS SERIES#
- #SCRIBD BATTLETECH TACTICAL OPERATIONS SIMULATOR#
This lead ED to get permission to release a retail version but the retail version is much more in-depth.
#SCRIBD BATTLETECH TACTICAL OPERATIONS SIMULATOR#
They developed the Desk Top Simulator for A-10A pilots to use to transition to the A-10C. Some of the reason is because of government contracts, the A-10C for example. Including KI helicopters dropping infantry, civilians, and observing suspect buildings with spawning enemies. This is completely up to the mission designer, I already played a lot of afghanistan style missions in DCS. I think US aircraft killing Soviet/Korean tanks is getting old after Digital Integration's series, after Falcon 4, after EEAH/EECH, after Novalogic's arcade sims, after Jane's.Īgain, I did not intend to offend anyone (ED) and I still think KA-50/A-10C is great, it's just how I feel about it and I'm wondering whether I'm the only one. Wouldn't that be awesome? Imagine we could be that virtual pilot you see in Restrepo, in Ross Kemp, over at Wikileaks' clips, etc. Or maybe even a campaign, roughly based on one's tour. If those were used as inspiration you could at least create a sequence of 4 or 5 missions. There's tons of war stories based on 2003~2013 in the sand, both unofficial and official in the form of books (e.g. Why aren't we strafing a compound with the risk of hitting civilians or our own ground troops, why aren't we putting a JDAM on a Taliban entrenchment in the Korengal Valley that's ambushing a convoy, why aren't we loitering at 5000' overseeing the drop off of 10 marines by a CH-47 near a known IED production site?
#SCRIBD BATTLETECH TACTICAL OPERATIONS SERIES#
Yet, as modern as the DCS series might be, we're still bombing airfields the size of our own and launching Mavericks at SA-13s in a green Western-like environment. USSR tank busting role for which current hardware was initially designed. We all know that Afghanistan/Iraq are wars with entire different difficulties and missions than the traditional US vs. I might be seeing ghosts here but somehow it's like they don't want to tap in anything contemporary, like they don't want to make it too realistic, but keep it a game instead. And after they set the standard so high, I think 3rd party projects created by dedicated enthusiast can be great in terms of graphics but can only reach an FC3 level when it comes to realism and immerision and never a Ka-50/A-10C level.
#SCRIBD BATTLETECH TACTICAL OPERATIONS MANUAL#
I once read something about top notch/more recent aircraft having classified systems, but how classified is classified when the AH-64D block 2 manual is on sites like Scribd.ĭon't get me wrong, A-10C is a great sim I think, we haven't had so much realism concerning avionics/systems in any other sim. Perhaps only slightly in line with the opening post, but why is the ED addition to the DCS series always focused on slightly older or less delicate aircraft?